Kenneth Clayton

I am Alison Mutch , senior coroner, for the coroner area of Manchester South

On 11 th September 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of Kenneth James CLAYTON. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 27 th January 2025. The conclusion of the inquest was NARRATIVE: Died from the complications of an unobserved fall that occurred in the Emergency  Department during a prolonged wait for an inpatient bed. The medical cause of death was 1a) Bronchopneumonia 1b) Neck of Femur Fracture (operated  on) 1c) Fall II) Frailty, Vascular Dementia, Acute Kidney Injury.

Kenneth James Clayton was taken to Tameside General Hospital after two falls  at his home address. He was assessed as requiring inpatient admission to a  medical ward. Whilst waiting for an inpatient bed to become available he had an unobserved fall in the Emergency Department. He was found to have fractured  his neck of femur and was operated on. Post operatively he deteriorated and  developed complications from the fracture and operation. He died at Tameside  General Hospital on 23rd August 2024.

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the  circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –

1. The inquest heard evidence that a key factor in the fall was the prolonged time Mr Clayton was in the Emergency Department waiting for a bed to become  available on a ward. The evidence was that he had been in the emergency  department for about 8 hours when he fell. The inquest was told that the design

of an Emergency Department is not suited to a need for prolonged observation  of high falls risk patients. In addition generally patients are cared for on hospital trolleys which cannot be lowered in the way a hospital bed can be which further increases the risk of falls.

1. Prolonged waits in Emergency Department were on the evidence given to the  inquest not unusual. As an example the court was told that on the morning the inquest was heard there were patients who had been waiting 40 hours for a bed  on a ward.
2. The inquest was told that the primary reason for the challenges in moving  patients through the Emergency Department was availability of beds. The  evidence given was that the main challenge in freeing up beds was delayed discharge of patients who were medically ready for discharge but who needed a  care package or a care home place to facilitate a safe discharge.
3. The inquest was told that for patient safety it was important, that whilst there  were delays in ED throughput of patients, that a robust falls risk management system was in place. Tameside Hospital had put additional measures in place to manage falls risk in ED in a more consistent way but it was unclear what steps  were in place nationally to manage falls risk in a consistent way in Emergency Departments.

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and/or your organisation have the power to take such action.