Joseph Forbes Black
Response Status
Report Content
Coroner
I am Ian Potter, assistant coroner for Inner North London.
Legal Powers
›Show details
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
Investigation and Inquest
On 17 August 2023, an investigation was commenced into the death of Joseph Benjamin FORBES BLACK, aged 39 years at the time of his death. The investigation concluded at the end of an inquest on 23 December 2024. The conclusion of the inquest was ‘drug-related death’. The medical cause of death was: 1a acute polydrug toxicity (heroin, cocaine, metonitazine, protonitazine) 1b substance misuse disorder II mental health disorder
Circumstances of Death
Joseph Forbes Black had a longstanding history of harmful substance misuse, against a backdrop of ‘unspecified schizophrenia’. He engaged well with the treatment of his schizophrenia and his mental health was considered stable in the time leading up to his death. However, despite being aware of available help, support, and treatment in relation to substance misuse, Mr Forbes Black repeatedly declined to engage. On 9 August 2023, Mr Forbes Black was found deceased at his home address. He died as a result of acute polydrug toxicity, which included the taking of heroin that had been adulterated with protonitazene and metonitazene. The presence of ‘nitazenes’ more than minimally contributed to his death.
Coroner's Concerns
During the course of my investigation and the inquest, the evidence revealed a matter giving rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTER OF CONCERN is, as follows: For context, on 26 July 2023, the Office for Health Improvement & Disparities issued a ‘National Patient Safety Alert’ (Ref no.: NatPSA/2023/009/OHID) (‘the Alert’). The Alert was entitled ‘Potent synthetic opioids implicated in heroin overdoses and deaths’ and it referred to known nationwide incidents of so-called ‘nitazenes’ having been found in batches of heroin. The Alert required, certain healthcare providers, to raise awareness of the heightened risks to anyone who may use drugs. There was clear evidence that the risks raised by the Alert were communicated to Mr Forbes Black within the timeframes required. They were communicated by a mental health nurse, who was treating Mr Forbes Black in relation to his schizophrenia. Naloxone, the ‘antidote’ for opioid overdoses, was not administered in Mr Forbes Black case. This because the circumstances in which he was found did not indicate that the administration of naloxone would be of any use in this instance. Staff at the supported accommodation where Mr Forbes Black lived, had naloxone that they could administer to residents if the staff came across a situation in which the administration was indicated. The evidence revealed that, neither the supported accommodation provider nor the mental health NHS Trust that was treating Mr Forbes Black were permitted to give naloxone kits to their residents/patients who were known drug users. In my experience, from this inquest and others, a significant proportion of illicit drug users are not engaged with or decline to engage with substance misuse services for a number of possible reasons. The evidence in the inquest was that, if a drug-user wanted to have naloxone in their possession as a safety-net measure, they would need to obtain this from a local substance misuse service. I am concerned that this set of circumstances raises the risk of future deaths occurring because the provision of naloxone kits could be made more widely available to those most likely to need them. The present situation appears to be that naloxone is most easily accessed through the very service(s) that many drug-users are not engaged with. My concern, based on the evidence heard at this inquest and others that I am aware of, is that this is not a localised matter and is more likely a nationwide issue and that action should be taken more widely. It further seems to me that the need for action is heightened by the increased incidence of heroin having been adulterated with ‘nitazenes’ (particularly potent synthetic opioid drugs), which increases the risk of drug users unwittingly overdosing.
Action Required
In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe that you have the power to take such action.
Your Response
›Show details
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 27 February 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed.
Copies and Publication
›Show details
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: The solicitors acting on behalf of Mr Forbes Black’s family North London NHS Foundation Trust The London Borough of Camden I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted summary form. She may send a copy of this report to any person who she believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.
Details
- Report Date
- 2 January 2025
- Coroner
- Ian Potter
- Coroner Area
- Inner London North
- Reference
- 2025-0005
Related PFDs
- Frederick Ireland-Rose6 Jun 2025 · of Inner North London · 92% similar
- Frances Newbury10 Nov 2023 · Inner North London · 90% similar
- Paul Reeves12 May 2025 · Inner London North · 90% similar
- Nathan Forrester31 Jan 2023 · Inner South London · 90% similar
- Anthony Nixon16 Aug 2024 · of Durham and Darlington · 89% similar