Skip to main content
InquestIQ

John Howlett

6 September 2024Coroner: Alison MutchArea: of South Manchester
Care Home Health related deaths | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Report Content

Coroner

I am Alison Mutch, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of South Manchester

Legal Powers

Show details

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice  Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013

Investigation and Inquest

On 6 th February 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of John  Francis HOWLETT. The investigation concluded on the 13 th August 2024 and the  conclusion was one of Narrative: Died from exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease contributed to by frailty due to dehydration and poor  nutritional status. The medical cause of death was 1a) Infective exacerbation  of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease II) Frailty

Circumstances of Death

John Francis Howlett had severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. He was placed at The Lakes Care Home due to his severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. He required oxygen and was bedbound. He became increasingly frail whilst at The Lakes with poor nutrition and fluid intake. He developed an  infection and was admitted to Tameside General Hospital. He was treated but  despite the treatment he continued to decline as a consequence of the  exacerbation of his underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and  frailty. He died at Tameside General Hospital on 31st January 2024.

Coroner's Concerns

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to  concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. –

  1. The inquest heard that on arrival at A and E at Tameside Hospital Mr Howlett spent 22 hours in a corridor despite suffering from an infection  and the distress that this caused. The inquest was told that this was due to the demands on the department and the challenges of moving  patients onto wards due to capacity issues. The inquest was told that  this was not unique to that particular day or indeed to the hospital and  was the picture across the country at that time.
  2. The evidence before the inquest indicated that the care home in  question had been of concern in relation to the care offered to residents for some time. It was indicated that action plans were in place  particularly in relation to safeguarding concerns given the vulnerability of residents. However despite those steps being in place and the  concerns the systems were not in place at the care home to robustly  monitor his nutritional status and fluid intake. He became increasingly  frail with decreased physiological reserves as a consequence.

Action Required

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action.

Your Response

Show details

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 1 st November 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken,  setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

Copies and Publication

Show details

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons namely [REDACTED] on behalf of the family, who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or  summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he  believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication  of your response by the Chief Coroner.